Search for: "C.D.2" Results 1 - 20 of 1,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
See also Doe v Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 74 (1995); R. 2:11-3(e)(2). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
In this context, the plaintiff was required to substantiate two key elements: 1) protectable ownership interest in the mark; and (2) the defendant’s use of the mark is likely to cause consumer confusion. [read post]